![Image](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/dARRLPGk0zHoe4qqDiC0sIsgB6Q=/0x0:3646x2431/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/72923812/1813817630.0.jpg)
Touchdown (16-14 SEA)
Field Goal (17-16 LAR) Washington Commanders Touchdown (19-12 SEA to 19-19)
Touchdown (26-19 SEA to 26-26) Dallas Cowboys Field Goal (35-27 SEA to 35-30 SEA)
Touchdown (38-35 DAL) Both of the Commanders touchdowns and the Dallas field goal came after the Seahawks scored, so it’s not always a case of the offense failing to move the ball. Allowing 35 points in 7 possessions is very, very bad. No doubt there have been back-breaking penalties that have impacted half of these scoring possessions, but Seattle’s 4th quarter defense has been generally woeful during this losing run. Yes, the Seahawks offense could’ve done a lot better against the Rams considering the defense generally played well in that game, but they put up over 400 yards against the Commanders and Cowboys and the defense gave up 28 combined 4th quarter points anyway. Over the past four games—yes, we’ll include the blowout loss to the San Francisco 49ers in this one—the Seahawks 4th quarter defense ranks: 32nd in EPA/play
32nd in success rate
32nd in dropback EPA/play (including QB scrambles)
31st in rushing EPA/play
26th in rushing success rate
![Image](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/764P3mAmdAo9b4v2Yw9g5VHnoII=/400x0/filters:no_upscale%28%29/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25127685/screenshot_rbsdm.com_2023.12.01_23_01_18.png)
Source: https://www.fieldgulls.com/2023/12/2/23 ... statistics